| Cosmetic Solutions

Lint Removal

Home

Customer Reviews:

Average Customer Review: 2.5

( 7 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 found the following review helpful:

Don't waste your money!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Nov 15, 2009
By Victor Von
My gal just purchased this and we are taking it right back to the store! What a waste of time and money. You get about 2-3 strokes on the floor before the adhesive is gone for that sheet. My gal says she should have swept the floor first before we used this piece junk. HUH? That's double the work!
and it takes five minutes to find the part of the roller edge to try to pull it off and get a clean sheet. You only get 25 sheets BTW.

This is a bad product even though it is made in Canada.

2 of 2 found the following review helpful:

Couldn't live without it Jan 21, 2010
By DivaK "neat freak"
Perhaps the product has changed since the previous reviews were written. My boyfriend and I use this roller daily to remove pet hair from the couches, and it does a fabulous job. Neither one of us have ever encountered difficulty separating the sheets (and he is NOT exactly the patient type), and it removes hair and lint more thoroughly than any product or vacuum we have ever tried. The only con is the price, but we just stock up on refills whenever they go on sale!

2 of 2 found the following review helpful:

EZ-Peel Is A Joke! Jan 13, 2010
By BTX
My gosh! How can this company get away with claiming the roll is "EZ-Peel"?

The roll is the compete opposite of EZ-Peel.

You will want to pull your hair out trying to remove the sheets. You absolutely cannot easily find the edge to start the peel.

You will be driven crazy trying to peel the roll.

This is so sad since the 10" wide sheets are great if using it on large surfaces.

Evercare, please redesign the roll. Please! But until you do, I recommend people avoid this product.

Loved this product when it was as represented on box Jun 17, 2011
By Holly Allison "Holly Allison"
I'm updating my original review from: I love the product but manufacturer changed the handle/wand configuration so what's represented on package photo is the original telescopic wand which I much pefer. What's inside the box is different. The new design makes it difficult to seperate handle from wand because it no longer protracts into itself to shorten wand for storage. The new design makes it very difficult to seperate the wand from the handle. The original design was discontinued in favor of this "upgraded" wand & handle, sothe photo on the packaging misrepresents what is actually inside. I still use the original model (as shown in photo) and it's definetely much easier to use and to store.
Updage: December 2011: Although I still don't like the new telescopic wand configuration for reasons listed in original review the product itself does a good job and I use the large lint removal pads all the time. I wish the manufacturer had not "upgraded" the handle wand using a cheaper aluminum & w/a new design that no longer protracts into itself. Tho it's an awkward upgrade from original configuration, I still use it frequently but glad I kept my original purchase (from Target).

Has Some Problems May 30, 2011
By Kathie B.
I bought this a few years ago at a home and garden show. I thought it was a great idea since you can use the roller, which is a paint roller, to paint with also.
It worked great, but it is way to hard to peel the layers off. The one I bought had 200 sheets. I see now they sell them with less sheets so maybe this is better since the space between the sheets ended up opening up and the whole thing came off the roller. It should be designed so that the sheets are not all even and in one chunk like that, then they would not come apart and fall off. Maybe since they are made with less sheets now it doesn't happen any more, I don't know. I am going to stick with the smaller rollers from now on and just use the roller handle to paint with.

See all 7 customer reviews on Amazon.com

You may also like ...